By Tim Porter, CircumspectNews.com – June 27, 2016
Brexit, the British exit from the European Union, is a major breakthrough for the independence of nations. Freedom lovers all over the world have been hoping for such a watershed event to encourage other national populations to reclaim their sovereignty and independence from globalist multilateralism. However, today’s Brits will have to be diligent to guard against the deception that is coming next….
Remain nation-state or slide toward ‘soulless globalism’
‘Divide between Trump and Clinton on the role of government could not be more stark’
By Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala)
USA Today, May 12, 2016 - For the first time in a long time, this November will give Americans a clear choice on perhaps the most important issue facing our country and our civilization: whether we remain a nation-state that serves its own people, or whether we slide irrevocably toward a soulless globalism that treats humans as interchangeable widgets in the world market.
‘Nation-state remains the true foundation of happiness & harmony’
Denounces NAFTA, ‘international unions’ jeopardizing U.S. independence
The Hill, Arpil 27, 2016 – “We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism,” Trump promised during a speech in Washington.
“I am skeptical of international unions that tie us up and bring America down,” he claimed. “And under my administration, we will never enter America into any agreement that reduces our ability to control our own affairs. The nation-state remains the true foundation of happiness and harmony.” …. NAFTA, Trump said, “has been a total disaster for the United States and has emptied our states of our manufacturing and our jobs.”
The list of “international unions” to which Trump refers includes more than just the more commonly known United Nations, World Trade Organization, and NATO, all of which have the United States as the chief sustaining member. It also includes the various continental, regional blocs, such as the European Union, African Union, Eurasian Union, and Union of South American Nations (UNASUR). All of these organized blocs of nations are declared to be authorized and under the auspices of the UN, an organization largely underwritten by American taxpayers. Like NAFTA (consisting of North American Free Trade nations Canada, US and Mexico), all of these blocs originated as economic trade blocs. However, officials from these and other blocs have publicly declared the desire for their bloc to become a geopolitical jurisdiction, so that each bloc would integrate into a federal union of nations, using the EU’s incremental approach as the model.
Cruz: Benghazi attack was ‘direct result’ of Rubio’s support for Clinton’s, Obama’s toppling of Qaddafi in Libya
Breitbart, Dec 10, 2015 – Sen. Ted Cruz, in an exclusive interview with Breitbart News here in his campaign office on Monday, escalated his battle with Sen. Marco Rubio on the 2016 campaign trail to a whole new degree: Now, Cruz is laying out why Rubio is responsible for the terrorist attack in Benghazi.
Cruz’s argument goes like this: Rubio backed now former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential frontrunner, and President Barack Obama in their efforts to take Muammar Qaddafi out in Libya. As a result, that spiraled the nation into the control of jihadists, who then carried out the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012.
Republicans, Democrats in congressional
‘Gang of Eight’ knew of operation
Breitbart, Nov 30, 2015 – The Obama administration pursued a policy in Libya back in 2011 that ultimately allowed guns to walk into the hands of jihadists linked to the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) and al-Qaeda (AQ) in Syria, according to a former CIA officer who co-authored a report on behalf of the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi (CCB) detailing the gun running scheme.
In Congress, the then-bipartisan group known as the “Gang of Eight,” at a minimum, knew of the operation to aid and abet America’s jihadist enemies by providing them with material support. So says Clare Lopez, a former CIA officer and the primary author of CCB’s interim report, titled How America Switched Sides in the War on Terror, speaking with Breitbart News….
The 2011 “Gang of Eight” mentioned in this report was comprised of a bipartisan group of lawmakers from both chambers.
National Review, Oct 22, 2015 – It was revealed in today’s Benghazi hearing that on the day he was killed, Ambassador Chris Stevens reported in a wire to the State Department that he had met with Wissam bin Hamid, a warlord with al-Qaeda connections. When Representative Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) confronted Hillary Clinton with a picture of Bin Hamid and the head of the al-Qaeda’s Ansar al Sharia group, Mohammed al-Zawahari, Clinton said she had no knowledge such a meeting took place.
“Were you aware that our folks were either wittingly or unwittingly meeting on the ground with members of al-Qaeda hours before the attack?” Pompeo asked.
“I know nothing about this, congressman,” “I know nothing about this, congressman,” Clinton replied.
A check of the transcript, and also with Rep. Pompeo’s Washington office, indicated that this short, two-minute exchange was the only time in Clinton’s eleven hours before the House Select Benghazi Committee that this smoking-gun revelation was mentioned. It was buried approximately two hours into the hearing. The revelation supports evidence gathered by the independent Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi that the U.S. and NATO were knowingly facilitating arms shipments to and from al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya during and after the revolution and deposing of Muammar Gaddafi, with the intention of forwarding those weapons to similar “freedom fighters” in Syria. For more information, see the video, Global Shakedown: ISIS, Ukraine and the New Cold War, embedded below.
As the ISIS hordes and other Islamist terrorist groups continue their bloodlust in the Middle East, the European Union’s ongoing tug-of-war with Putin’s Eurasian Union over Ukraine is being described as the start of a new Cold War.
See Global Shakedown: ISIS, Ukraine and the ‘New Cold War’ (27-minute video), and other videos at YouTube channel LexRex1644.
The world’s developing regional blocs, including the ASEAN (Assn of Southeast Asian Nations) Economic Community (AEC), and its model, the European Union (recall the “European Economic Community” of the ’60s), are shown in this map from this YouTube video produced in the Philippines. The video was produced by the Philippine ASEAN Business Advisory Council and SM Investments Corporation to promote the AEC to Philippine businesses.
This network of regional blocs is being developed without the general knowledge or consent of the world’s populations. The final alignment of these blocs’ member nations is uncertain, as several notable nations have not finalized plans to join any bloc. China may be its own “region,” although it has also made overtures to South Asia’s SAARC, to the chagrin of SAARC’s present anchor nation, India. However, both nations are members of the development fraternity, BRICS, along with Brazil, Russia, and South Africa, all of whom are anchor nations of their respective regional blocs.
Kissinger: world order will require ‘concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another’
By Alex Newman
The New American
Sept 21, 2015
In Africa, owing to a lack of infrastructure and communications, unifying the entire continent all at once is simply not practical. So, globalist planners — both from the “West” and from the “East” — are making use of sub-regional governments that will eventually all be merged under the emerging single African regime….
That, in essence, is what globalist forces eventually hope to do to the entire world. Once national governments worldwide finish surrendering their sovereignty to regional regimes — the EU, the AU, Vladimir Putin’s Eurasian Union, the Union of South American States (UNASUR or UNASUL), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Middle-East Union, and more — all of the regional blocs will be subsumed under a single global authority.
None of this is a secret, and those involved in the agenda have openly boasted of their machinations. “The contemporary quest for world order [world government] will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order [regional government] within the various regions and to relate these regional orders [governments] to one another,” explained senior globalist Henry Kissinger in his latest book, World Order.
Why are Jeff Miller, others in Congress, Senate promoting the political federation of East Africa?
Pushing Political Federation in Name of Economic ‘Free Trade’
Hope Magazine (Rwanda) April 16, 2012, AllAfrica.com April 15, 2012 - Senators and Representatives of the Congress from the United States of America… paid an official visit to the Secretary General for the East African Community, Dr Richard Sezibera, in Arusha…. The delegation led by Senator James Inhofe,…. also included Senator John Boozman (Arkansas), Congressman Jeff Miller…. Also in attendance was the EAC Deputy Secretary General in charge of Political Federation, Ms Beatrice Kiraso. In his remarks, Senator Inhofe praised the Secretary General for leading his troops in the integration process…. Senator Inhofe further noted that the USA was keeping tabs on the progress and developments at the EAC.
EAC to draft constitution for political federation
New Vision (Uganda), Sept 12, 2013 – The East African Community (EAC) is to name a team to draft the Constitution for the regional political federation….[Ambassador] Hatega said Uganda, Kenya and Rwanda started on the process in June and were later joined by Burundi during the August Mombasa summit. He explained that the treaty that established the EAC stipulated four steps namely the customs union, common market, monetary union and the final stage of political
How could these members of the U.S. Congress and Senate go to the East African Community to promote this “free flow of goods, services and people” across national borders — and actually meet with the EAC deputy secretary general in charge of facilitating the the political federation of those nations – and it not occur to them that this so-called free-trade “free flow” objective is the main cause for the derelict border policy on our own borders in the U.S.? The “free flow” mantra is an integral part of the so-called “free trade” agenda, and inevitably leads to integrated political jurisdiction as in the EAC.
NAFTA tribunals now claim authority to overturn U.S. Supreme Court commerce decisions, and thus claim North American jurisdiction.
By Tim Porter, Updated July 14, 2014
Members of Congress who talk about securing the U.S.-Mexico border, but all the while support “free trade,” are being totally dishonest. That’s because the “free flow of goods, services and people [labor]” across national borders within regional blocs is the very definition of their “free trade.” This “free trade” is not “free enterprise,” but “managed” trade, run by unelected, unaccountable big gov/big business, (i.e., “fascist”) consortiums.
It is the goal of all major “free trade” blocs of nations on earth, building upon created regulatory institutions such as NAFTA tribunals, to become vast regional political jurisdictions like the European Union, with its “free flow of people” within a continental “Schengen Zone” perimeter. Examples:
● European Union: Under Brussels’ rules, citizens of member states have the right to ‘free movement’ in other EU countries. Daily Mirror (UK) Jan 15, 2014
● Arabian Peninsula: The meeting assumes significance amid growing regional challenges including security concerns created by the Islamic State [IS] and the Sharura standoff on the Saudi-Yemen border…. Earlier, the GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] had announced the formation of a unified military command…. The GCC countries are also planning to launch a common visa on the lines of the Schengen [European Union] visa to allow Gulf-based expats and foreign businessmen to move easily across the borders of the six-member bloc… Arab News, July 9, 2014
● Eurasian Union: Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan have agreed to set up a Eurasian economic union, an EU-style intergovernmental economic mechanism, in 2015 to facilitate the free flow of people, capital and goods. China Daily, July 11, 2012
● SE Asia: ASEAN [Association of SE Asian Nations] is now working towards the establishment of regional economic integration …. under which there will be freer flow of capital, goods, services, investment, and people throughout the region. International Financial Law Review, November 30, 2012
● S America: UNASUR’s [Union of South American Nations] goals include the deepening of South American cooperation … the free flow of goods, currencies and people between these countries, … World Politics Review, Jan 12, 2009
● N America: The overall goal …. would pave the way for the faster flow of people and goods and services across our traditional border… Windsor Star (Canada), Feb. 21, 2012
The “free flow” of people illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border isn’t being allowed by derelict U.S. officials simply to enlarge a dependent class to empower Obama’s “blue state” socialist America. These derelicts’ main objective is to amalgamate the continent into a two-class economy to establish a socialist North America – a North American Union.
Republicans’ excuse for “immigration reform” amnesty is a lie. Vladimir Putin is not pushing open borders in the Eurasian Union “for Hispanic votes.” Neither are the monarchies of the Arabian Peninsula or the governments of South America, Southeast Asia or Canada. All of this is corroborating evidence that the “free flow” of people illegally crossing the U.S-Mexico border is intended primarily to aid in building a North American Union, within a global network of “free trade” blocs. These regional blocs are designed – through created institutions such as NAFTA tribunals – to morph into regional political jurisdictions patterned after the European Union. (PDF )
By Tim Porter, July 30, 2012 (links updated Nov 2014)
Re: REGION-BUILDING: U.S. FOREIGN AND ECONOMIC POLICY
Despite the “situation ethics” cited for rebuilding Afghanistan and Iraq, a sizeable majority of Americans are generally opposed to the concept of “nation-building.” Surely, that is why the American public has not been plainly made aware that U.S. foreign intervention policy goes far deeper than mere nation-building. It is “region-building” – in Afghanistan, Africa and elsewhere – through the development of multilateral economic and security agreements that are designed to morph into geopolitical regional jurisdictions.
….At varying stages, all of these geopolitical regions, including North America, are pursuing the same “region-building” objectives [as documented in the attached review], including:
● “Harmonization“ of trade, customs and industry regulations among the nations within each region.
● Integrated regional infrastructure, including regional power grids, pipelines and highways.
● Integrated regional courts, tribunals, parliaments and regulatory agencies that supersede national jurisdictions.
● Integrated military and law enforcement, with intelligence information sharing, ostensibly to fight terrorism and crime “that transcends national borders.”
● “Outer security perimeters” modeled after the European Union’s “Schengen zone,” within which there is to be a “free flow of cargo, services and people” among the nations within each regional perimeter. Only in this context does the motive for congressional and presidential dereliction in U.S. border security over the past several decades become clear.
● Economic and monetary integration, up to and including a currency in each region….
You, Representative Miller, have contributed to this region-building, with your reversal to vote for CAFTA in 2005 (your switch determined its passage), and your recent trip to the East African Community (EAC), to support and encourage those nations’ economic and political integration….
A joint study of the Australia and New Zealand productivity commissions, April 2012, Page 19 ….In reality, countries can adopt some elements from different levels of integration. Accordingly, bilateral and regional arrangements tend to be more complicated than suggested by figure 5. For example, current trans-Tasman arrangements embody elements of free trade and a common market.
In many respects Australia and New Zealand are good candidates for higher levels of integration due to: similarities in culture, institutions and values; geographic proximity; and a common language. Even so, there are also some potential downsides to high levels of integration. For example, some decisions may need to be taken above the national level and this can be regarded as unduly compromising national sovereignty.
Australia and New Zealand are the principal nations in the Pacific Islands Forum, and their bilateral integration toward a common currency would become a springboard for greater regional integration. The above chart from the Australia-New Zealand joint study is the same path that all of the world’s major geopolitical regions have embarked upon toward regional governance. Currently, North America is moving past level one (free trade), with intensive effort being made, through the Beyond the Border agreement, the Regulatory Cooperation Council and the North America Leaders Summit, to reach level three. According to a USG (U.S. government) document released by Wikileaks, attention will be focused upon level four (a common currency) once level three is in place.
Older news items at NEWS ARCHIVE