Regional ‘orders’ promoted as incremental step toward world order

MORE QUOTES FROM GLOBALISTS PRESCRIBING REGIONAL BLOCS

Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Klaus Schwab, even 
Vladimir Putin: “These are the integration bricks….”

Globalists envision a regional structure to a “global form of federalism.” All of the world’s regional blocs recognize the European Union as the leading prototype for regional development. Accordingly, all of the founding BRICS nations – Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – are the strongest anchor nations within their respective regional areas.

Global and inter-regional organizations, funded by globalist financial institutions, are designed to be the mortar that aligns and strengthens the regional blocs into a global structure.

Here are exact quotes from some of the most noted globalists of the past six decades: Vladimir Putin, Henry Kissinger, Frederick Kempe, Klaus Schwab, Guy Verhofstadt, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Strobe Talbott, Richard N. Gardner, and Lincoln Bloomfield:

In their own words….

VLADIMIR PUTIN, Prime Minister of the Russian Federation
A NEW INTEGRATION PROJECT FOR EURASIA
Izvestia, October 4, 2011 (Putin’s column was also posted on the official Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union.)
It took Europe 40 years to move from the European Coal and Steel Community to the full European Union. The establishment of the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space is proceeding at a much faster pace because we could draw on the experience of the EU and other regional associations….
We plan to go beyond that, and set ourselves an ambitious goal of reaching a higher level of integration – a Eurasian Union….
We believe that a solution might be found in devising common approaches from the bottom up, first within the existing regional institutions, such as the EU, NAFTA, APEC, ASEAN inter alia, before reaching an agreement in a dialogue between them. These are the integration bricks that can be used to build a more sustainable global economy.

HENRY KISSINGER, national security advisor, secretary of state during Nixon, Ford administrations
WORLD ORDER (Penguin Books, 2014)
The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.

FREDERICK KEMPE, President and CEO, Atlantic Council
(Six former CIA directors are on the Atlantic Council Board of Directors.)
WORLD GOVERNMENT SUMMIT, March 29, 2022
“I think you’re going to see the evolution of regional organizations, and that regional–because it’s so hard to create a world order–I think you’re going to see regional orders spring up. And then you would have links between regional orders. But they will be very much guided by economic interests, social interests and also security interests….”

KLAUS SCHWAB, founder of the World Economic Forum
COVID 19: THE GREAT RESET, (Forum Publishing, 2020)
The most likely outcome along the globalization-no globalization continuum lies in an in-between solution: regionalization. The success of the European Union as a free trade area or … (a proposed free trade agreement among the 10 countries that compose ASEAN) are important illustrative cases of how regionalization may well become a new watered-down version of globalization….
COVID-19 will just accelerate this global divergence as North America, Europe and Asia focus increasingly on regional self-sufficiency rather than on the distant and intricate global supply chains that formally epitomized the essence of globalization.

GUY VERHOFSTADT, Prime Minister of Belgium, President of the European Council
Opening Ceremony of the College of Europe – Natolin Campus
Warsaw, October 23, 2001
THE NEW WORLD ORDER SINCE 11 SEPTEMBER
We could order the world on the basis of existing regional cooperation organisations: the European Union, ASEAN, Mercosur, NAFTA, the African Union, the Arab League and SAARC in southern Asia. In this context, we should also include countries like China, Russia and Japan, and the whole of Oceania.
We need to take a first step down the path towards a global form of federalism, a structure where the reality of an increasingly interactive world is finally made a political reality too. In fact, a structure of this kind was already planned when the United Nations was created in 1945, but was never implemented after the Cold War.
The New World Order could lead to a new G8, G9 or G10, with regular meetings between the delegates of the world’s continents….
The European Union is the model which shows this is possible.

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI, National Security Advisor for President Jimmy Carter
STATE OF THE WORLD FORUM, 1995
We cannot leap into world government in one quick step…. the precondition for eventual globalization – genuine globalization – is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative union.

STROBE TALBOTT, Editor, Time Magazine (Talbott, Bill Clinton’s roomate in the Oxford Rhodes Scholarship program, would soon become Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State under Madeline Albright.)
THE BIRTH OF THE GLOBAL NATION, Time Magazine, July 20, 1992
Here is one optimist’s reason for believing…. nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. A phrase briefly fashionable in the mid-20th century – “citizen of the world” – will have assumed real meaning by the end of the 21st century….
The cold war also saw the European Community pioneer the kind of regional cohesion that may pave the way for globalism.

RICHARD N. GARDNER, U.S. Ambassador to Italy, 1977-81; U.S. Ambassador to Spain, 1993-97, Member of the Trilateral Commission, 1974-2005
THE HARD ROAD TO WORLD ORDER, Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations), April 1974
What is “worst” about our times for those who wish for rapid progress toward world order is clear enough. The United Nations is very far from being able to discharge the responsibilities assigned by its Charter for the maintenance of international peace and security….
The hope for the foreseeable future lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction [i.e., United Nations, etc.] as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis….
In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault….
The next few years should see a continued strengthening of the new global and regional agencies charged with protecting the world’s environment.

LINCOLN BLOOMFIELD, Director of Global Issues, National Security Council; Department of State; MIT Political Science
A WORLD EFFECTIVELY CONTROLLED BY THE UNITED NATIONS, March 10, 1962

(Prepared for IDA [Institute of Defense Analyses] in support of study submitted to the Department of State under contract N. SCC 28270, February 24, 1961)
We accept here the equation according to which wholesome community building at any level is a process in which consensus (consent and acquiescence in the general ground rules and overall values of the system) comes first. It may then be followed by development of a community [i.e., European Community, etc.] with some organic coherence….
A “normal” historical process, in which ever-larger units evolve through customs unions, confederation, regionalism, etc., until ultimately the larger units coalesce under a global umbrella, could take up to two hundred years, on past performance figures, and even this may be optimistic….
I have suggested that an alternative road may bypass the main path of history, shortcircuiting the organic stages of consensus, value formation, and the experiences of common enterprise generally believed to underlie political community. This relies on a grave crisis or war to bring about a sudden transformation in national attitudes sufficient for the purpose. According to this version, the order we examine may be brought into existence as a result of a series of sudden, nasty, and traumatic shocks….
Thus a hypothetical model can be constructed, fulfilling the characteristics of “a world effectively controlled by the United Nations.”….
We concluded that in theory it could come about in the short, medium, or long run by a brink of war — or a war — combined with the development of evolutionary trends that might favor it as the time span stretches out. [note added]